Paragraph |
|
Page. |
|
From the author |
3 |
|
|
|
First Part |
ORIGIN OF TÜRKS |
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
|
5 |
1 |
Phonetic variety and semantics of the ethnonym Türk |
5 |
2 |
Location, ethnical composition and enumeration of Türks |
10 |
3 |
Place of Türks among other nations of the world and their pre-Türkic ethnic roots |
15 |
First chapter |
Traditional historical science about the ancient ethnic history of Türks |
19 |
4 |
Origin of the traditional historical science and its influence on
non-Indo-European research |
19 |
5 |
Eurocentrism and colonial policy |
22 |
6 |
Were the Türks ”un-historical”? |
23 |
7 |
Traditional historical science about the ethnic roots of Türks |
25 |
8 |
Should the ancient ethnic history of Türks be studied? |
27 |
9 |
Were the Türks solely nomadic? |
29 |
10 |
Were Türks inclined to constant migrations? |
31 |
11 |
Were Türks Mongoloids only, and spreaders of Turkic language
to non-Mongoloids? |
34 |
12 |
Dwellers of the Eastern Europe, Near and Central Asia before the ”arrival” of
the Türks |
36 |
13 |
Where was the ancestral home of Türks and when? |
39 |
Second chapter
|
Detection means for the ethnic roots of the Türks |
43 |
14 |
Primary sources and historical works |
43 |
15 |
The sources of ethnogenesis and their mutual relationship |
45 |
16 |
The role of ethnonyms in tracing the ethnical roots |
48 |
17 |
Ethnonyms and ethnic composition of population |
51 |
18 |
Primary Türkic ethnonyms and their specifics |
53 |
19 |
Secondary Turkic ethnonyms and semantics of their roots |
57 |
20 |
Ethnonym-producing affixes |
61 |
21 |
Ethymology, semantics and function of the ethnonym Türk |
64 |
22 |
Ethymology, semantics and function of the ethnonym
Tatar |
67 |
23 |
Ethymology, semantics and function of the ethnonym Madjgar
> Magyar |
69 |
24 |
Mutual relation between the history of ethnonym and the history of ethnos |
73 |
Third chapter |
Ancient Türkic-speaking areas |
76 |
25 |
General information |
76 |
26 |
Role of Türkic language in detecting ancient Türkic areas |
78 |
27 |
Most ancient Türkic traces in American Indians'
languages and possible most ancient Türkic-speaking areas |
80 |
28 |
Bright traces of Türks in the Sumerian language |
83 |
29 |
Ancient Türkic-speaking area in Near East |
86 |
30 |
Ancient Türkic-speaking area in Central Asia |
90 |
31 |
Ancient Türkic-speaking areas in Caucasus, Black Sea Coast,
Ural-Itil
region and Western Siberia |
99 |
32 |
Hunnish ethnic roots of Türks and their areas |
107 |
33 |
Türkic ethnic roots in Hunnish tribes Syanbi, Usun, Tabgach,
Jujan,
Ephthalite |
112 |
34 |
Antique Türks by the rock and cave pictograms and
inscriptions, and destinies of the Turkic peripheral areas |
114 |
35 |
Traces of Türks in Etruscan culture, or one more
disappeared Türkic area |
117 |
36 |
Some arguments of Adilya Aida demonstrating the Türkic-speaking
of Etruscan ancestors |
121 |
Fourth chapter |
Scytho-Sarmatian ethnic roots of Türks |
125 |
37 |
General information |
125 |
38 |
Reliability of ancient sources reports about Scythians |
128 |
39 |
Herodotus about Scythians |
131 |
40 |
Briefly about the history of Scythian studies in the general history |
134 |
41 |
Briefly about the history of Scythian studies in the Türkology |
137 |
42 |
Basic flaws in the Scytho-Iranian theory |
139 |
43 |
Some arguments of the Scytho-Iranian theory |
141 |
44 |
Ethnic composition of Scythians based on etymology of Scythian
ethnonyms Scyth, Ishguza, Skolot, Sarmat, Agathir, Gelon, Saka |
145 |
45 |
Ethnic composition of Scythians based on etymology of Scythian-related
ethnonyms Kaspi, Traspi,
Argippei, Iirk, Melanhlen, Katiar, Paralat, Massaget |
148 |
46 |
Ethnic composition of Scythians based on etymology of Scythian
ethnonyms Tauri
(Tochar/Togar/Tagarma) and Angarean |
152 |
47 |
Ethnic composition of Scythians based on Scythian words with
etymology given in ancient sources
|
155 |
48 |
Ethnic composition of Scythians and Sarmatians from archeological, ethnological,
religious-mythological and artistic facts |
157 |
49 |
Do ancient sources corroborate Irano-linguality of Scythians? |
160 |
50 |
Do ancient sources corroborate Türkic-linguality of Scythians? |
163 |
Fifth chapter |
Alano-As ethnic roots
of Türks |
166 |
51 |
General information |
166 |
52 |
Reasons for initial opinion about Ossetian-linguality of Alans/Ases? |
167 |
53 |
Is Ossetian-linguality of Alans confirmed by the text of Zelenchuk epitaph and ”Ioan Tsets” phrase? |
168 |
54 |
Were the Hungarian Alans Ossetian-lingual Ases, as argues Ju. Nemeth? |
170 |
55 |
How were Alans classified by their contemporaries? |
172 |
56 |
Türkic-speaking of Alans by specifics of the use of
ethnonyms |
174 |
57 |
Ethno-linguistic characteristics of Alans by facts of the
ethnonym Alan |
177 |
58 |
Ethno-linguistic characteristics of Alans by facts of the
ethnonym As/Yas |
178 |
59 |
Ethnic structure of Alans /Ases by their close mutual relations with
Huns |
181 |
60 |
Ethnic structure of Alans /Ases by their close mutual relations with
Khazars
and Kypchaks |
183 |
|
Conclusion |
186 |
61 |
Recap |
186 |
|
|
|
Second Part |
ORIGIN OF TATARS |
192 |
Introduction |
General information about Tatars |
192 |
62 |
Who were called and are called Tatars |
192 |
63 |
About ethnonym Bulgars and its meanings |
198 |
64 |
Names of Tatar and Bulgar as internal and external
ethnonyms |
201 |
65 |
Ethnonym Bulgaro-Tatarians and its semantics |
204 |
66 |
Composition of Bulgaro-Tatarians and their numbers |
207 |
First chapter |
History of study the ethnogenesis of Tatars |
212 |
67 |
First attempts to study the ethnogenesis of Tatars |
212 |
68 |
History of study the ethnogenesis of Tatars in the Mongolian Chingizid states |
215 |
69 |
History of study the ethnogenesis of Tatars and Bulgars by Russian
scientists |
218 |
70 |
Origin and development of the Magyaro-Misharo-Tatarian concept in the
history of study the ethnogenesis of Tatars |
223 |
71 |
Origin and development of the Bulgaro-Tatarianian concept in the history of
study the ethnogenesis of Tatars |
225 |
72 |
Renewal of the Bulgaro-Tatarianian concept in the study of the ethnogenesis
of Tatars |
228 |
73 |
Emergence of need to define the essence of the Bulgaro-Tatarianian concept |
231 |
74 |
Further complete confirmation of the correctness of the Bulgaro-Tatarian
concept |
234 |
75 |
Origin and development of the Tataro-Tatar concept in study the ethnogenesis
of Tatars |
239 |
76 |
Origin and development of the Bulgaro-Chuvash concept in study the
ethnogenesis of Tatars and Chuvashes |
242 |
77 |
Campaign for returning of the ethnonym Bulgar and against use of the
name Tatars |
244 |
78 |
New attempts to revive the Tataro-Tatar concept and their side motivations |
248 |
79 |
Why Tataro-Tatarists fear a complex study of the Tatars' ethnogenesis? |
249 |
80 |
Methods of protection the Tataro-Tatar concept |
251 |
81 |
Is so-called ”new concept” in study the history of Tatars new |
258 |
82 |
Historical science, like any science, must be objective |
256 |
83 |
What would result from predetermined ethnogenetical fabrications of the
Tataro-Tatarists? |
260 |
Second chapter |
Ancestors of Bulgaro-Tatars |
265 |
84 |
General information |
265 |
85 |
Whose ancestors were Bulgars: of Chuvashes or Tatars? |
268 |
86 |
Ancestors of the Bulgarian people were local Subars, Kumans and others |
274 |
87 |
Ancestors of the Bulgarian people were local Huarasmians (Suars and Ases),
Huns |
274 |
88 |
Ancestors of the Bulgarian people were local Skl's, Barsuls, Bards |
279 |
89 |
Ancestors of the Bulgarian people were local Koshans/Kasans, Usuns, Avars,
Alans |
281 |
90 |
Ancestors of the Bulgarian people were local Ases, Burtases, Ostyaks, Suases and
Vedas |
283 |
91 |
Ancestors of the Bulgarian people were local Baylars/Bilyars/Bigers/Biars,
Bashkirs, Mishars/Madjgars |
286 |
92 |
Ancestors of the Bulgarian people were Kumans, Sarymans, Besermyans, Khazars,
Ugors |
289 |
93 |
Early Bolgars/Bulgars in studies of the Danube Bulgarian scientists |
291 |
94 |
Early Bulgars per Bulgarian annals ”Dzhagfar Tarihy” and ”Legend About Shan's
Daughter” |
294 |
95 |
Tribes of the archeological cultures in the formative regions of the Bulgaro-Tatars |
298 |
Third chapter |
Linguo-ethnical distinctivenesses of Itil Bulgars |
302 |
96 |
General information |
302 |
97 |
From the history of study of Itil Bulgars |
303 |
98 |
First phase of study of the Bulgar epigraphics and launch of the Bulgaro-Chuvash concept |
308 |
99 |
Beginning of systematical study of the Bulgar epigraphics |
310 |
100 |
Analysis of the language of the 2nd style of the Bulgar epigraphics |
316 |
101 |
How and why A. P. Kovalevsky ”found” Chuvashizms in Ibn-Fadlan's
work? |
320 |
102 |
”Chuvashizing” of the Bulgarian words in the records of Ibn-Fadlan |
322 |
103 |
Are any Chuvash words in Slavo-Bulgarian ”Nominalia”? |
326 |
104 |
Are any Chuvashizms in ancient Balkarian runic inscriptions? |
331 |
105 |
Are any Chuvashizms in the Hungarian language? |
336 |
106 |
Finno-Ugrians of the Itil region borrowed words with rhotacism not from
Bulgarian, but from Chuvash language |
339 |
107 |
Are any Bulgaro-Chuvashian loanwords in Russian? |
340 |
108 |
Itil-Bulgarian language in primary sources |
342 |
109 |
Bulgars are a part of Sakaliba people, and Sakaliba are Kypchaks |
346 |
110 |
Were the Slavs Sakaliba? |
351 |
111 |
Classification of the Bulgarian language |
356 |
Fourth chapter |
Rise and development of Bulgaro-Tatarian statehood |
358 |
112 |
General information |
358 |
|
Ancient Türkic states
with contacts with Bulgar's
ancestors |
361 |
113 |
States in Near East and traces of their links with
Bulgar's ancestors |
361 |
114 |
Ancient Khoresm and traces of its links with
Bulgar's ancestors |
365 |
115 |
Parthian, Aryan, Sogdian, Kangaras, Greko-Baktrian, Kushan,
Ephtalite and Kimak states and traces of their
links with
Bulgar's ancestors |
368 |
|
Pre-Bulgarian states with control over future
Bulgarian regions |
373 |
116 |
Scythian, Bosporian states and their contacts with
Bulgar's ancestors |
373 |
117 |
Sarmatian, Alanian, Western Hunnish, Avarian and Khazarian states and their
contacts with
Bulgar's ancestors |
377 |
|
Pre-Bulgarian state Biarmiya |
378 |
118 |
General information |
378 |
119 |
Problems of locating Biarmiya |
382 |
120 |
Concept Biarm-Perm |
384 |
121 |
Matching facts in the history of Biarmiya and Bulgar |
388 |
122 |
Identification of Biarmiya with Itil Bulgaria reflected in the material culture |
389 |
123 |
Identification of Biarmiya with Itil Bulgaria reflected in the spiritual culture |
391 |
124 |
Traces of Biarmiya's links with Scandinavia
in the history of Bulgaria? |
392 |
125 |
Is Perm related to Biarm? |
393 |
126 |
Was Biarmiya independent or Bulgaria was called Biarmland? |
395 |
|
States Madjgar, Bashkurt, Burtas, and Bulgar |
396 |
127 |
Does the Madjgar state belong to the Bulgaro-Tatarian state? |
396 |
128 |
Bashkurt state and its relation to the Bulgaro-Tatarian state |
398 |
129 |
Was there a Burtas state and what relation it had with the Bulgar
state? |
402 |
130 |
First Bulgar/Bolgar states |
405 |
131 |
Danube Bulgaria and its links with Itil Bulgaria |
408 |
132 |
Rise of Pre-Mongolian Itil Bulgaria |
410 |
133 |
Territory of Itil Bulgaria |
413 |
134 |
Results of the sovereign development of the Itil Bulgaria |
416 |
|
Rise and disintegration of the Tatar states |
420 |
135 |
Ulus Djuchi in the system of Chingizid empires and problems of its study |
422 |
136 |
Ethnic processes in Ulus Djuchi |
423 |
137 |
States formed after dissolution of the Djuchi Ulus |
425 |
|
Bulgarian and Kazan Khanaates |
427 |
138 |
Transformation of the Bulgarian Khanaate into Kazan Khanaate and its fall |
429 |
|
Drive of Bulgaro-Tatars to revive their state |
432 |
139 |
Struggle of Bulgaro-Tatars for survival in the conditions of the tsarist Russia |
432 |
140 |
October coup and acquisition of statehood by Tatars |
435 |
141 |
Struggle for the Tatarstan's state sovereignty, revival and development of the
Tatar nation |
437 |
|
Conclusion |
441 |
142 |
Recap |
441 |
|
Literature listing |
446 |
|
Ethnonym Index |
474 |
|
Name Index |
480 |