Back Home Contents Türkic Genetics In Russian |
Sources Roots Writing Language Religion |
Genetics Geography Archeology Coins |
Genetics: Blood Types Genetics: Lingo-Ethnical Tree Ethnic Affiliation Scythians Scythians 7 c. BC Pazyryk 4-2 c. BC Burial place of a Massagetan warrior 8-7 c. BC |
Scythians and their descendents Besenyos, Ogur and Oguz Scythians Alans and Ases Kipchaks Kipchaks in Europe |
Alan Dateline Avar Dateline Besenyo Dateline Bulgar Dateline Huns Dateline Karluk Dateline |
Kimak Dateline Kipchak Dateline Khazar Dateline Kyrgyz Dateline Sabir Dateline |
||||||
Scythian-Iranian theory | Ossetian Genetics | Scythian language | ||||||||||
Etruscan Genetics | ||||||||||||
EASTERN HUNS (or TÜRKIC) GENETICS in CHINA SHANDONG PROVINCE
|
||||||||||||
Introduction |
||||||||||||
Briefly, the Chinese genetists found that a group of the Huns, who broke away from their center, and settled as
a compact enclave among the settled population of North-Eastern China, left a genetic trace that is
distinct from the surroundings. This trace is in the best way identified as a mixture
of the population typical for today's Portugal and Turkey. The population of Portugal preserved
better the ancient Iberian roots than the rest of the Iberian population,
they (with their Basques) are closer to Proto-Europeans - in geographical sense - than the
other Europe. For our description, they represent geographical Proto-Europeans and genetic
Caucasians (aka Europoids). 2500 years ago the Huns of Linzi were
genetically closer to Proto-Europeans, i.e. were Paleo-Sibirians.
And in 500 years, as a result of mixture with Northern-Asians,
they became genetically similar to today's Uigurs, Kirgizes and
Altaians. The isolation of Linzi Huns allowed to make a test-tube
research of genetic change of the Hunnish/Türkic Paleo-Siberian population as a
result of genetic contact with the Far Eastern
Asian population. A funny part is that the Chinese genetists were
surprised, their preconceived notions must have duped them. These facts are perfectly illustrated by
Fig. 3 and 4 of the report:
|
||||||||||||
Source and Comments | ||||||||||||
Comparison of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences of three populations that lived in the same location, Linzi, China, in different periods: 2,500 years ago (the Spring-Autumn era), 2,000 years ago (the Han era), and the present day. Two indices were used to compare the genetic differences: the frequency distributions of the radiating haplotype groups and the genetic distances among the populations. The results indicate that the genetic backgrounds of the three populations are distinct from each other. Inconsistent with the geographical distribution, the 2,500-year-old Linzi population showed greater genetic similarity to present-day European populations than to present-day east Asian populations. The 2,000-year-old Linzi population had features that were intermediate between the present-day European/2,500-year-old Linzi populations and the present-day east Asian populations. These relationships suggest the occurrence of drastic spatio-temporal changes in the genetic structure of Chinese people during the past 2,500 years. |
||||||||||||
Links |
||||||||||||
http://www.white-history.com/china_files/linzi_genes.pdf | ||||||||||||
Genetic Structure of a 2,500-Year-Old Human Population in China and Its Spatiotemporal Changes |
||||||||||||
Results and Discussion
We compared the genetic structures of three populations that lived in the same location during three separate historical periods and found that the genetic structure of the inhabitants of Linzi has changed greatly over time. The period of Chinese history that dates to 2,500 years ago corresponds to the transition period from the Spring-Autumn era to the Warring States era, and the period around 2,000 years ago was in the middle of the Han era. Linzi, our sampling location, was the capital of the feudal state Qi in the Spring-Autumn and the Warring States eras. Qin, one of the feudal states during those periods, conquered other states, including Qi, and established the first unified nation in China. Subsequently, the Han dynasty followed Qin after great disturbances of war. Therefore, our finding that the population structure of Linzi changed drastically during those periods can be concordant with these historical events. ... we analyzed hypervariable region I of the mtDNA by PCR using two sets of primers that amplify the overlapping MT1 (positions 16190-16422) and MT4 (positions 16135-16366) regions. Based on this present-day reference network, we constructed a network of the mtDNA sequences of the two ancient populations and the present-day people of Linzi (fig. 1, not shown). Ten individuals of the 2,500-year-old Linzi population had mtDNA type with 16274A; this mtDNA type was not found in either the 2,000-year-old or the present-day Linzi populations. Sixty-five percent (22 of 34) of the individuals of the 2,500-year-old Linzi population belong to group IV, whereas none of the 2,000-year-old population and only 8% of the present-day Linzi population belong to that group. In contrast, 38% (5 of 13) of the 2,000-year-old Linzi population belong to group VI, compared with only 9% and 10% of the 2,500-year-old and the present-day Linzi populations, respectively. The 2,000-year-old and present-day Linzi populations showed high frequencies for group I (23% and 30%, respectively) and for group II (31% and 36%, respectively). Other present-day east Asian populations, including Mongols, Koreans, and mainland Japanese, also have high frequencies for groups I and II (fig. 2). FIG. 2.—Geographic distribution of six radiation groups in the east-central
Eurasian continent.
...We also estimated the nucleotide diversity within each population and the genetic distances between the populations. We used the 172-bp mtDNA sequence data for comparison due to the lack of 13-bp data (positions 16366-16378) in the present-day European populations. The nucleotide diversities for the Linzi populations were
Nucleotide diversities within the other present-day populations were similar (range 0.011-0.027). The smallest genetic distance for the present-day Linzi population was that from the Mongols, followed by those from mainland Japanese and Koreans. Surprisingly (Sic! - Translator's Note), the three smallest genetic distances for the 2,000-year-old Linzi population were from the present-day central Asian populations: the Kirghiz (Sary-Tash), followed by the Kazakh and the Uighurs. Even more surprisingly (Sic! - Translator's Note), the three smallest genetic distances for the 2,500-year-old Linzi population were from the Turkish, Icelander, and Finnish, rather than from the east Asian populations. The results indicate that the genetic backgrounds of the three populations in Linzi are distinct from each other. Figure 3 shows the phylogenetic tree based on those genetic distances; present-day populations from east Asia, including the present-day Linzi population, form a cluster, which is consistent with their geographical distribution. However, the 2,000-year-old Linzi population lies outside the present-day east Asian cluster, and the 2,500-year-old Linzi population clusters with the present-day European populations. FIG. 3.—A neighbor-joining tree for 19 human populations.
The multidimensional scaling method was also applied to the genetic distance matrix data (see fig. 4). The overall constellation of the 19 populations is quite similar to that of the neighbor-joining tree of figure 3. This two-dimensional scattergram explains 96.2% of the variation, and the significant portion is already explained by horizontal axis 1. Because the present-day European populations are on the left side and the present-day east Asian populations are on the right side, this representation can be equated to the geographical map of populations, except for the two ancient populations in China.
FIG. 4.—The multidimensional scaling of 19 human populations.
This strengthens the very odd (Sic! - Translator's Note) location of the 2,500-year-old Linzi population. It should be noted that the population distance analysis is based only on sequence differences within and between populations. Therefore, ambiguity of the phylogenetic relationship of mtDNA haplotypes... does not cause serious problems in the population analyses. The similarity between the genetic structures of the 2,500-year-old Linzi population and the present-day European populations indicates that there was a genetic shift in the Linzi area from a European-like population to a population more like those found in present-day east Asia, probably caused by migration. This is in accord with the existence of the Eurasiatic superfamily languages, which surround a linguistically unique Sino-Tibetan language, the present-day Chinese language. Future molecular studies of ancient populations will help us discover the places and times of human diversification and the migration routes of ancient populations. |
Footnotes |
|||||||||||
Source and Comments |
||||||||||||
Scythian-Iranian theory | Ossetian Genetics | Scythian language | Scythian Word List | Zelenchuk Inscription | ||||||||
Etruscan Genetics |
8/10/2005