Classification of Türkic languages |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links - Ссылки |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preface |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Etymological tracing of the languages strongly differs
from the studies of the modern linguistic picture. The modern picture reflects the state of
scholarship in the field, a fairly static picture with some prominent lacunas. Etymology looks at
process, trying to reach to the bottom. Not to the center of the Earth, with its glob of
undifferentiated magma, but to the rain clouds in the sky that spew the water flows, each river with its own
personality, watershed area, and tributary system. Climbing up the river allows to reach confluence
points from where comes an amalgamated flow. A complex analysis of stream components and their
topology, with some concept of the watershed properties, leads to gradual discernment of the
processes and components involved.
It must be given that all languages are a result of amalgamation, there is no self-contained language on this Earth with a theoretical exception of some island locations completely isolated from the rest of the humanity. The amalgamation is corroborated by the Y-DNA composites describing any modern monolingual ethnicity or nation-state. This indisputable fact invalidates any mythological “proto-language” constructs of the “PIE” or Biblical type. Rather, a diverse myriad of tiny linguistic communities kept amalgamating with time into ever growing and shrinking societies till they reached a pinnacle of multi-lingual nation-states. If human languages appeared 30,000 years ago, English people first were speaking in foreign tongues for 29,000 years before English was pieced together http://www.danshort.com/ie/grafx/timeline.gif
As of today (2018), even the very number of the Türkic languages is not established. Different
sources cite figures 40+, 42, 45, and the like. Nor there is a single phonemic system for either old nor modern Turkic languages. That illustrates not only the European political and scholar aversion to the supercharged subject, but also the complexity of the subject, faulty premises, the blurriness of the spotty definitions, the ingrained biases, the randomness of the undertaken studies, and a train of direct and indirect obstacles. The following listing is cited from the Sevortyan E.V., 1974, Etymological Dictionary of Türkic languages (Common Türkic and inter-Türkic vowel stems), Science, Moscow. 1974, pp. 8-9. The listing for the abbreviations used in the volume 1 is incomplete, it is being complemented by amendments in the next 6 volumes, but it gives some initial idea on the complexity of the object. For example, it includes Halaj but excludes the ancestor Alat and other daughter Alats. The listing is also somewhat redundant, it randomly includes over again linguistic time slices of the same languages. The complexity of the object is no wonder, the Celts carried some bits of the lexicon around Mediterranean in the 4th mill. BC, like the word cairn, which ascends to the first appearance of the cairn burials in the Eastern Europe at the dawn of the Kurgan culture, 6th-7th mill. BC. The time depth, mobility, and events certainly complicated the object.
Numerous other Türkic languages with documented or recoverable lexical elements and identified ethnicities were neither perused nor included in the listing: Abdaly/Ephthalite, Alan/As/Yazır/Masgut, Avar/Avshar, Bayad, Bayundur, Beğdilli, Büğdüz, Chepni, Chunkar, Bosnyak/Pecheneg, Dodurga, Düger/Digor/Tuhsi/Tokhar/Tochar, Ekrad, Eymür, İğdir, Karkın, Kimak, Hunnic, Kayi, Kangar, Sabir, Salur, Scythian, Uisyn/Usuns, Varsak, Yaparlı, Yıva, Yörük, Yüreğir, and probably some more. Where readily available, the listing adds the phylum of the ancestor language, i.e. Lobnor Uigur Karluk-Horezm is the “Lobnor” language of the Uigur branch of the Karluk branch also called Horezm branch. There is plenty of confusion with the naming, mostly associated with the location where an expedition run their studies. This is a confusing and sad practice, in conflict with the accepted scientific norms that anchor the name to the autonym of the ethnicity. Literal translations, like an alien Lebedin (Лебединский, Russian for “swan's”) instead of the native Kuu (swan) further obfuscate the subject. In most cases, such homemade confusion is not warranted at all. Historically, the tribal alliances went by the name of the leading ethnos (super-ethnos), and that name (i.e. Oguz, Türk, Kangar, Tele etc.) covered all subethnoses, and that defined the names of the constituent languages including the lingua franca (usually, a Sprachbund). Some languages, like the Altaians, coalesced from a diverse collection of immigrant languages. In a couple of the last centuries, they formed their own informal Sprachbunds finally formalized by the new Soviet power into a new Altaian Esperantos administratively imposed on the entire still diverse populace, at the expense of the local vernaculars. The cultural slaughter in the Altai was criminal, children were forbidden to use their mother tongue. The subject of the 8-volume etymological compendium was to trace development from the base roots to the formed Türkic languages. To review the etymology of the 85 listed Türkic languages, the scientific team had to turn to the whooping 204 languages, from Avesta to Japanese. That demonstrates the extent of amalgamation, the reach of the words across linguistic families, and the Türkic contribution to the Eurasian languages. The complete original listing in Russian is shown following the translated citation in English.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Список сокращений и условных обозначений